I am the author of a Chessable course about the Modern Defence. On this link, you can practice the checkmate against the chess computer.Īny comments, suggestions and improvements are welcomed very much. The only thing I can advise from this point onwards is … PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE. Still, I hope this post has given you idea behind performing this complex checkmate, or at least clarified that it is not THAT DIFFICULT. your web browser and/or your host do not support iframes as required to display the chessboard alternatively your wordpress theme might suppress the html iframe tag from articles or excerpts CONCLUSION Some typical mating pictures are shown on the diagrams below: (Please note that the Black will once again be the weaker side of this checkmate). The most important thing to remember about the bishop and knight checkmate is that it typically occurs with the black king in the corner whose colour is THE SAME TO THE COLOUR of the white bishop. ![]() ![]() Finally, an example of the whole checkmate consisting of forcing the black king in the corner will be presented. In the remainder of the post we will initially consider the basic mating picture. Then we will introduce the typical position with the so called W MANEOVRE, which is crucial in performing the checkmate. But my opinion is that it can’t do much harm to study it, and it also shouldn’t consume much time. To sum up, there are both PRO ET CONTRA arguments considering the bishop and knight checkmate. And that can be very important factor in the middlegame. It was quite lucky that I have never had the opportunity to exercise it over the board, because it would be quite shameful to lose the half point because of your own chess incompetence.Īdditionaly, there is an argument that learning the bishop and knight checkmate deepens the understanding of the coordination of these two minor pieces. I think that learning the bishop and knight checkmate should be considered the basic chess culture. ![]() I think that not learning the bishop and knight checkmate isn’t something I should be very proud of. Check this video of World Chess Champion Anna Ushenina, or this game by a strong grandmaster Vladimir Epishin, for instance. Too be honest, I don’t have a very convincing answer against that. It would make me quite a hypocrite to advocate learning this checkmate as a must, when I have gone for so many years without bothering to do it.Īnd also, there were quite stronger players who embarassed themselves in this area of the chess game. Therefore, a very good question is whether one should focus on other areas of chess instead of the specific checkmate that is very unlikely to appear over the board. Even I finally understand it, but they once again nothing.” I explain the theorem for the third time. I explain the theorem for the second time, and still nothing. “ Imagine, I explain them the theorem for the first time, and nothing. ![]() To be honest, that is pretty lucky for me, since I am not at all certain that I have fully mastered the checkmate.Īnd the fact that I am writing a post about the very same checkmate merely reminds me of a joke about the university professor, who complains to his colleague about his students: Not even once was I even close to reaching the afore mentioned endgame. During the course of the last 6 years I have played around 150 tournament games. There is much to be said about the point of learning this checkmate in great detail.īecause the main argument against bothering yourself with this relatively complicated mechanicsm is the probability of its occurence over the board. Finally we have arrived to the most difficult “ elementary” checkmate – The bishop and knight checkmate.įirst of all I would like to enter a short theoretical discussion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |